The Lebanon School District's
Deal With the Devil
By Louis R. Petolicchio
Posted November 1, 2007
In late August, the Lebanon
Daily News reported on a curious story about how the Lebanon School District
(LSD), in what would appear to be a desperate effort to re-secure funding
for the ill-fated Polaris School, had recruited estate senator David J.
Chip Brightbill to lobby Governor Ed Rendell to reinstate financing for
the alternative education program. Brightbill is now a lobbyist with
the law firm Stevens & Lee.
Following are excerpts of
the Lebanon Daily News (LDNews) story of August 22 (the LDNews deletes
all online articles after a week):
Brightbill, along
with district Superintendent Marianne Bartley and school-board President
Debra Bowman met last week with Gov. Ed Rendell to discuss restoring funds
to the district's alternative-education school, Polaris, which lost its
funding in one of the final spending cuts before passage of this year's
$27.2 billion state budget.
Now that Brightbill has opened
the door to the governor's office, the school board on Monday night hired
the law firm of Stephens & Lee where Brightbill works as a counsel
on government affairs on a monthly retainer of $10,000 to continue the
fight for Polaris funding. The agreement calls for the firm to work on
behalf of the district until November 2008, but it can be terminated by
either side on a month's notice...
Initially, Brightbill arranged
a three-year, $9 million grant for Polaris. That was increased to $5 million
annually in 2006, with the intention of opening the school to other districts
in the county. It is the extra money budgeted for that unfulfilled plan
which is keeping the school afloat this year, Bartley said. However, more
than half a dozen employees, including five counselors, had to be let go,
she said.
Bartley is hoping that,
with Brightbill's help, funding for the school will not only be restored
for next year but for years to come...
Bartley said the school district's
association with Brightbill has already paid off because he arranged the
meeting with Rendell. Also involved in the meeting, via speaker phone,
was Gerald Zahorchak, the state's secretary of education. A follow-up meeting
with Zahorchak is scheduled for today, she said.
[State Senator Mike] Folmer
was not informed of the meeting, Bartley said, but has been supportive
of restoring funding to Polaris, as has state Rep. Mauree Gingrich, whose
district includes Lebanon.
A subsequent editorial by the
LDNews hailed this new and "wise alternative" to getting state taxpayer
financing for this experimental program. And while on the surface
this may have appeared to be a good will effort to use every means available
to aid the LSD, further thought on the matter has led to some rather disturbing
questions which are remaining unresolved.
To begin with, how can the
school district reasonably expect our elected officials in the state legislature
to do their job including determining the proper expenditure of taxpayer
money - when they are hiring law firms to act as lobbyists for their special
interests?
Heck, isn't this use of a
lobbyist in such a blatantly anti-republican manner undermining the very
nature of our representative form of government? After all, wasn't
Brightbill fired by the people of the very district now paying him big
bucks to bypass the legislative process? And what should the children
in the LSD glean from this, that the proper political process can be circumvented
if you have enough money (taxpayer money, at that) to hire a lobbyist?
If that's the case, then why bother with civics lessons in school; if they
need to cut staff, the LSD has just demonstrated that they history teachers
can be the first to go.
And while district Superintendent
Marianne Bartley and school-board President Debra Bowman may hold out high
hopes of seeing a big return for the $10,000 a month in taxpayer money,
doesn't anyone else find it odd that the school district is willing to
spend at least $120,000 a year on an effort that may or may not pay off?
How is that a responsible use of tax money? Indeed, would it not
have been better spent helping the students in the school district instead
of being used to line the pockets of a rich lawyer and lobbyist?
In fact, if they have $120,000 a year to blow (and we don't know how many
years they will be using Brightbill), then is it possible that the LSD
is not in as tough financial straights as they claim? Or is this
decision just a general indication of financial mismanagement throughout
the school district? After all, If they have blown the budget on
this line item, then what other 'important' expenditures have been screwed
up?
But the superintendent and
school-board president are not the only ones who should be held to account
for this mismanagement of public money; the whole LSD school board should
be tossed out on their collective ears. After all, they had to approve
the $10,000 per month expenditure - and expenditure for which there is
no guarantee of a return. At least if they had authorized the purchase
of pencils, the school district would have writing instruments in inventory.
Another question one must
ask is whether it was really the prestige of an ex-legislator that opened
the door of a liberal Democrat governor - the same governor who conspired
with Brightbill to raise our taxes, overspend state dollars, and jump his
own salary or if it was their mutual acquaintances at the law firm of
Stevens and Lee? After all, haven't attorneys for Stevens & Lee
been putting money into "shadow" PACs (political action committees which
have high sounding names but are financed by one individual or an exclusive
group of people) that have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars
to political candidates throughout the state over the years? Isn't
it more likely that the real reason Rendell opened the door to Brightbill
not because of any perceived clout (remember, Brightbill lost the primary
by a margin of two-to-one) but because both Republicans and Democrats are
indebted to the financial aid they receive via PACs financed exclusively
by lawyers or their personal relations from Stevens & Lee?
And for all of the money
Stevens & Lee's counselors donate to political campaigns through their
"shadow" PACs, doesn't that beg the question: What do they want?
Do these lobbyists merely want access, or is there something more grandiose
lurking in the background?
So many questions, so few
answers.
And yet one irony remains:
according to the newspaper story the school district was supposed to have
a follow up meeting with the state's Secretary of Education on August 22
as a direct consequence of Brightbill's intervention - but the LDNews has
not run anything further on the matter, and a Google search has turned
up nothing.
Kinda curious, ain't it?
#### |