Striking Back Against
Teacher Strikes
Submitted by Rep. Daryl
Metcalfe
Posted November 1, 2007
Last year, one of my Metcalfe
Memos was titled "Pennsylvania Needs to Call Teachers' Unions 'Out' on
Strikes."
Public school teacher strikes
have a negative impact on all Pennsylvanians. The strike which is occurring
in the Seneca Valley School District is disrupting the lives of thousands
of families.
At a recent event, my wife
and I spoke with a man whose wife is a public school teacher in a district
close to Seneca Valley. He shared with us that the teachers union in his
wife's district was waiting to see what would happen in Seneca before they
made a decision to strike. The teachers union will use their strike in
Seneca to strike fear into school districts across the state.
Thousands of children in
Seneca have been denied the educational services that we, as taxpayers,
have already paid up-front for in our school property taxes. Family budgets
are drained by the unexpected costs that are a direct result of the schedule
disruptions forced upon families by striking teachers. Quality family time
normally enjoyed during regularly scheduled holidays and vacation time
is lost as public school teachers march on the picket line.
As if all of these economic
and quality of life losses at the hands of the teachers union are not enough,
the teachers ultimate objective is to take even more from those they were
hired to serve.
The majority of a school
district's budget is for salaries and benefits. The teacher's union demands
of across the board salary increases, whether a teacher's performance merits
it or not, is well above the rate of inflation year after year after year,
and is the primary cause of escalating school property taxes.
The teacher's union will
use Seneca Valley as an example of what they are willing to do to a community
if their demands are not fulfilled.
Unlike other union members
that choose to strike, the public school teachers who strike have no economic
loss because they are still paid for the 180 days of instruction that the
school district is required to provide.
Pennsylvania is the teacher
strike capitol of the nation. We claim the unfortunate distinction of having
more teacher strikes than all of the states who allow strikes added together.
Public school districts
were one of the government entities created by the Pennsylvania Legislature
to fulfill its constitutional responsibility to "provide for the maintenance
and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education." Our
system of public education is neither thorough nor efficient when we allow
striking public school teachers to disrupt the educational process.
Public school teachers are
employees of a local government entity known as a public school district.
Public employees, whether they are elected to constitutional offices such
as the governor, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court or the Pennsylvania Legislature,
or whether they are appointed, like the secretary of education or other
members of the governor's cabinet, or whether they are hired like public
school superintendents or public school teachers, are all supposed to serve
the public.
This is why we use the term
"public servants."
At what point in our history
did public employees lose sight of the true meaning of being a public servant?
The Pennsylvania Legislature
should enact the Strike Free Education Pact legislation that I have introduced
with my colleagues to protect Pennsylvania children, families and taxpayers.
It is time to send a strong
and clear message that public school teachers are still public servants.
It is time to end the teacher's
union ability to hold Pennsylvania families hostage to their demands.
It is time to end teacher
strikes in Pennsylvania.
#### |