Judicial Review, Lebanon
Style: Krancer Has My Vote
By Laurel Lynn Petolicchio
Posted November 1, 2007
The evening at the Lebanon
County Republican Committee Dinner on October 26 went well although lightly
attended with what appeared to be less than 100 people.
The main speaker was Pennsylvania
Supreme Court Justice Tom Saylor, who is running for retention on November
6 - and who has to be the worst speaker I think I have ever heard.
Perhaps it was the Big Pink Pig Bus, which was parked across the street
that unnerved him, but the bottom line is that he said nothing to encourage
voters to keep him on the bench.
Saylor spent his speech talking
about:
-
Our system of government and
how it has three separate branches
-
The role of the judiciary (to
interpret the constitution and protect the bill of rights)
-
What a retention vote is all
about
-
How a retention vote is cast
- but that it is not a vote, just a "yes" or "no". (What else is a vote?)
-
That the framers of the constitution
wanted to protect the supreme court justices from politics and coercion
-
That retention is not really
an election but a review of 10 years of work
-
"Judicial Independence" means
that the justices need to be free from threats and intimidation's, and
that they need to act as referees and be willing to make tough calls even
when the public doesn't like it. (Does that mean that it is okay to take
a pay raise even though the constitution may say 'no'?)
-
That we should vote for him
because he is from southeastern PA (?) and will probably be Chief Justice
soon! (I thought the court was supposed to
interpret the Constitution and not be bias towards one region over another;
guess I was wrong...)
That was Saylor's entire speech.
I think I got that same lecture in 7th grade (minus the part about how
justices need to be free of political threats; perhaps they are concerned
about Russ Diamond and PACleanSweep?).
Needless to say, Saylor will
not get my vote for retention.
The other funny thing about
this dinner was that it was like The Mauree Gingrich Show. Gingrich introduced
everyone and was on stage pretty much the whole time. Neither State Senator
Mike Folmer nor State Representative RoseMarie Swanger were included in
anything, until the end when Lebanon County GOP Chairman Joe McDonald stood
up and announced all presence of all elected officials. It was pretty
clear to this rank-and-file voter that the Lebanon County Republican Committee
is still disconnected from the grassroots voters in this district and will
continue to suffer political black eyes until they start acting like real
Republicans.
The one interesting and,
in my mind, impressive highlight was the presence of Mike Krancer, candidate
for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. He went around the room and visited
with everyone at the dinner. Gingrich acted as if she were obligated
to introduce him but before she could just dismiss him, he hopped up onto
the stage and gave a very brief overview of his beliefs (his time was limited
because Gingrich hovered over him like a vulture, obviously not interested
in having him talk at all).
Krancer began by asking the
audience to participate by saying "Amen" if they agreed with him (nothing
could have shocked this crowd more, but whatever enthusiasm was lacking
on the part of the political hacks was more than made up for by the reformers
who were present at the dinner):
"I'm a Reagan Conservative.
Do I hear an 'Amen'? I'm pro-life. Do I hear an 'Amen'?
I'm pro-gun. Do I hear an 'Amen'? I'm pro-economic growth.
Do I hear an 'Amen'? I'm pro-10 Commandments in the courthouse.
Do I hear an 'Amen'? I'm pro-state constitution and pro-federal constitution.
Do I hear an 'Amen'?
"And this is what I am not
for. I am not for justices legislating from the bench. That
is what Mike, RoseMarie and Mauree were elected to do - legislate. Justices
are to interpret the constitution and make sure that the laws are being
followed."
Krancer then referenced the
pay raise as being something he would not have ruled in favor of nor taken
as it was not constitutional. He also stated that he has not taken the
pay increase (at this point Gingrich was just about yanking the mike away
from him). He then asked for our support and proudly declared who
was supporting him - and then even more proudly declared that the trial
lawyers weren't supporting him and that he wouldn't take their money as
they didn't stand for what he believes in!
I must say that I think this
is the first time I have heard a judicial candidate say in no uncertain
terms what it is that he believes - and it was very refreshing.
I have just found a judge
I can vote for in Mike Krancer!
#### |